Citizens identify the stories they want investigating, vote on a winner, then pursue the story with editorial support from professional journalists and community managers. Addressing the lack of investigative journalism in mainstream media, as well as issues of public engagement with the news, this project seeks to hand over the editorial agenda to the public, giving them ownership of the story and therefore motivation to pursue . A website allows users to propose a story/issue they would like investigated, while a community manager seeks out offline or otherwise disengaged members of the community for their stories. Proposals can be made in any form, but video is encouraged, and a facility will exist to upload directly from mobile phone. This will then be seeded on YouTube and other social media. A regular vote decides which story is pursued, and the project community work together to gather and analyse information through blogs, wikis, databases, and repositories of raw material such as audio, video and documents. Because 'your' story could be next (the leaderboard is public), it is hoped a wider community will contribute. A 'karma' points system will help encourage this behaviour, while alerts help keep contributors in the loop and engaged. Central to the process is the editorial support provided by professional journalists, who will work with community members to identify sources, filter information, provide journalistic training, address legal issues and assist in structuring resulting stories. This also seeks to provide the 'self-actualisation' that is often identified as a key ingredient of successful citizen operations. Examples such as the Florida News-Press's investigation of utility rates have already demonstrated how such a crowdsourcing approach can empower and engage an otherwise disinterested community, while the pet food poisoning investigation carried out by blogs this year demonstrates how important stories can be overlooked by mainstream media but taken on by a committed body of people.